“Name and Shame”: An Effective Strategy for College Tuition Accountability?
“Name and Shame”: An Effective Strategy for College Tuition Accountability?
 
Print

Published Online in:
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
July 16, 2020

Dominique J. BakerSouthern Methodist University

Due to concerns about college affordability, in 2011 the Department of Education began producing two annual public lists of institutions with the highest change in tuition and fees and average net price within sector (top 5% and at least $600 increase). This study investigates the effect of this low-stakes federal accountability tool on institutional behavior. I use a frontier regression discontinuity design that investigates the effect of being included on either the tuition or net price list at the 95th percentile cutoff (restricting the sample to only include institutions with at least a $600 increase). I find no consistent effect of list inclusion on affordability or enrollment. I also present several robustness checks that also find little consistent effect.

Read the full open-access article

Read the press release: "Does the Federal Government’s 'Naming and Shaming' of Colleges with Large Tuition Increases Make a Difference?

 
 
Media Coverage
Print
 
 
Author Video
Print

Watch as study author Dominique J. Baker (Southern Methodist University) discusses the significance of her recent study published in Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis​.

 
Designed by Weber-Shandwick   Powered by eNOAH